Search for: "Wells v. Sullivan" Results 321 - 340 of 1,365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The first amendment combined with the supreme court’s 1964 landmark case of New York Times v Sullivan means that the bar is set very high for celebrities or public figures who want to sue for defamation. [read post]
3 May 2007, 7:32 am
Well, according to our Supreme Court, apparently not. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Settlements of civil legal actions are a good thing as well as completely necessary. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Ann Althouse] Citing First Amendment, federal court enjoins FDA from prohibiting truthful speech by drugmakers about off-label uses [WSJ, Alex Tabarrok (in recent years, federal government “has extracted billions of dollars in settlements from pharmaceutical firms for engaging in what appears to be constitutionally protected speech”), Beck and Sullivan, Drug & Device Law on Amarin v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 4:10 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2010/2010_09227.htm [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Justia’s Verdict blog, Sherry Colb discusses the court’s decision in Moore v. [read post]