Search for: "Will v. Hughes" Results 321 - 340 of 2,709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2014, 10:06 am by INFORRM
In the case of Stichting Ostade Blade v Netherlands (App 8406/06, 27 May 2014) the Third Section of the Court of Human Rights held that an Article 10 application by a Dutch magazine arising out of a police raid was inadmissible. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:53 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Firearms Dealers; revocation Where gun purchasers had the same last name and/or address as persons whose applications to buy firearms were denied the previous day, the district court reasonably held the sales were willful sales to straw purchasers. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 12:17 pm by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Labor RLA; preemption The Railway Labor Act does not completely preempt retaliatory-discharge claims under state law. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 3:53 am by Chiara Gallo
At the end of the second week of April with the sun starting to emerge, here are the latest Katposts.CopyrightImage by Francesco UngaroNedim Malevich reported the words of Deborah De Angelis, who discussed the recent conflict between SIAE and Meta in relation to Italian music on Facebook and Instagram.Anna Maria Stein discussed the recently issued “Copyright registration guide: works containing material generated by artificial intelligence” by the US Copyright Office.PatentsRose… [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 8:56 am by Chiara Gallo
 PatentsRose Hughes commented on the recent UK decision Astellas v Teva [2023] EWHC 2571 (Pat), in which the Court considered sufficiency, inventive step and infringement of the formulation patent, and highlighted how the decision is interesting for the consideration of the potential benefits and pitfalls of functional claim language. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 5:05 am by Gene Quinn
The Federal Circuit recently issued a non-precedential decision in LiquidPower Specialty Products v. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
 A reserved judgment is awaited in the fourth, Sobrinho v Impressa Publishing, heard on 7 to 9 December 2015 by Dingemans J. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am by CMS
In this post, Kenny Henderson, David Bridge, Jessica Foley and Devina Shah, who all work within the litigation and arbitration team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down last week by the UK Supreme Court in the matter Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE [2020] UKSC 51, which has significant implications for the UK competition law collective proceedings (or class actions) regime. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
In the case of ML and WW v Germany ([2018] ECHR 554) (available only French), the Fifth Section of the Court of Human Rights dismissed an Article 8 “right to be forgotten” application in respect of the historic publication by the media of information concerning a murder conviction. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 12:48 pm by ernst
Brown, political science professor at Auburn University who was the winner of the SCHS’s Hughes-Gossett Award in 2017. [read post]