Search for: "Wolf v. Roberts" Results 321 - 340 of 565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2016, 4:03 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the orders for this blog, while Mark Walsh covered the grant in Star Athletica v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Robert Bauer in an op-ed for The Washington Post; Petula Dvorak, also in The Washington Post; Tim Lynch at Cato at Liberty; and Robert Weisberg at Legal Aggregate; At The Trace, Olivia Li discusses Monday’s ruling in Voisine v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes observes that after yesterday’s October-sitting opinion from Justice Neil Gorsuch, “it is most likely that Chief Justice Roberts is writing the opinion for the Court in [partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:58 am by Victoria Clark
Harry Graver summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Ortiz v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Preap, which involves the immigration law’s mandatory detention provision, and Gundy v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:30 pm by Lauren Bateman
So far as this post goes, that will mean time-traveling back to two historical documents: first, 2005 congressional testimony by then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and then-FBI Director Robert Mueller III, regarding the renewal of the government’s surveillance authorities; and second, to a 2006 legal filing, submitted under Gonzales’ name to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (“FISC”). [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 12:04 am by Will Baude
After listening to the oral arguments in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
” In USA Today Richard Wolf reports on in Lee v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for Forbes, Robert Alt weighs in on Janus v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
More coverage of Monday’s decision in Evenwel v. [read post]