Search for: "Woods Schools Appeal" Results 321 - 340 of 644
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2014, 7:10 am
On Friday, October 3rd, the USPTO's Trademark Trial & Appeal Board (TTAB) and Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) will hold hearings in the Moot Court Room on the campus of Northeastern University School of Law. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:21 pm by Susan Schneider
Leflar; Law Clerk, McMath Woods, P.A.; Public Interest Extern, Attorney General for the Cherokee Nation; Corporate Extern, Walmart Stores, Inc.; Law Clerk, Mostyn Prettyman; Pro Bono Law Clerk, Legal Aid of Arkansas; Research Intern, Nature Conservancy; Consultant, Arkansas Wildlife FederationDistance LL.M. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 9:03 am by Joseph D. Kearney
Blise, a recent Marquette Law School graduate (Class of 2010). [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am by Marty Lederman
  (And, in any event, as the government explained at pages 55-57 of its Conestoga Wood brief, an entirely separate program for contraceptive insurance would likely not be as effective as one tied to employees’ existing insurance plans.)On the other hand, the Hobby Lobby Court gave some indication that it does not read RFRA to incorporate all of those pre-Smithfree exercise precedents, and we know from Justice Alito’s opinion that there are some Justices who view a new… [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 1:02 pm by JD Hull
The siding is a wood substitute made of cement and sawdust that, unlike wood, won't shrink or expand, requiring far less maintenance over the years. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 1:02 pm by JD Hull
The siding is a wood substitute made of cement and sawdust that, unlike wood, won't shrink or expand, requiring far less maintenance over the years. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:18 pm by Dawn Johnsen
Foskett Professor of Law at Indiana University’s Maurer School of Law. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm by Marty Lederman
 It therefore appears likely that the Supreme Court, unlike virtually every court of appeals, will identify the threshold RFRA question correctly. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am by John Elwood
Elmbrook School District v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
There is only one problem: Professor Barnett’s appeal to Chisholm is flatly inconsistent with his originalist commitment to textualism. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For one thing, Conestoga Wood makes both a RFRA and a Free Exercise claim in the Supreme Court, whereas Hobby Lobby preserved its Free Exercise claim in the appeals court. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 4:51 am by SHG
  Yet, they expect such finely honed allocutions to reflect levels of mitigated speech, delivered with precision and yet sincerity, to appeal to their prep school sensibilities. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Jeff Welty
Imagine yourself coming face to face with that big boy in the woods! [read post]