Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,054
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2020, 12:49 pm
The key to answering this question lies in paragraphs [116] to [119] of Lord Justice Jacob's judgment in Dyson Ltd v Qualtex (UK) Ltd. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 12:49 pm
The key to answering this question lies in paragraphs [116] to [119] of Lord Justice Jacob's judgment in Dyson Ltd v Qualtex (UK) Ltd. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
Scotland The Court of Session (Lord Clark) handed down judgment in the case of Wildcat Haven Enterprises v Wightman [2020] Scot CS CSOH 30. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am
This is largely derived from the reasoning of Lord Wilberforce in General Tire v Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company Limited [1975] 2 All ER 173 – a patent case in which it was held that "[d]amages should be liberally assessed but.. the object is to compensate the plaintiffs and not punish the defendants".The court is looking for the royalty which "would have been arrived at in negotiations between the parties, had each been making reasonable use of their… [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 5:24 am
In the words of Lord Nicholls –“Any other outcome would be deeply offensive to instinctive notions of what justice requires and fairness demands. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
The wording of the Notices followed the prescribed form precisely. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
The wording of the Notices followed the prescribed form precisely. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:53 pm
The Telegraph had campaigned hard for this, and the Carnegie UK Trust had championed this idea before the House of Lords Communications Committee. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
It was held that the words complained of were defamatory but that the republications were not. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
Nicol J held that the articles complained of were defamatory at common law and that the words in the articles contained defamatory meaning. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:30 am
Lord Carnwath gave the sole judgment, with which the other Justices agree. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 7:37 am
Our digital Lord Chamberlain would commandeer that capability at one remove,ES. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm
This issue was touched upon in an abstract sense by Lord Sumption in the Supreme Court’s decision in Lachaux (at paragraph 18) (though not, in our view, resolved). [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:42 am
” At Inside Sources, Neil Turkewitz warns that Google v. [read post]
Defamation Act 2013: A summary and overview six years on, Part 1, Sections 1 to 3 – Brett Wilson LLP
28 Jan 2020, 4:39 pm
According to Lord Sumption, in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd & Anor [2019] UKSC 27, the Act sought ‘to modify some of the common law rules which were seen unduly to favour the protection of reputation at the expense of freedom of expression’. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
What did the Founders mean by the words “high crimes and misdemeanors”? [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
And further dispute arose between Sheeran's song 'Photograph' (also written by the first and third claimants; Sheeran and McDaid) and a song called 'Amazing', following which there was a settlement agreement and 35% of the PRS royalties now go to the writers of 'Amazing'.Naturally, the Claimants sought to strike out these allegations, which came before Deputy Master Jefferis on 4 June 2019 on the basis that similar fact evidence is only admissible in civil… [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
New Brunswick Teachers’ Assn., 2001 NBCA 62, which adopted the following reasons of Lord Denning in London Artists Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
And he said, Blessed be the Lord God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:49 am
Bukartyk, R (on the application of) v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council (2019) EWHC 3480 (Admin) A judicial review of a refusal to take a second homeless application which should really be put in the ‘Councils, don’t do this’ list of things that councils shouldn’t do. [read post]
