Search for: "YOUNG v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 321 - 340
of 388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
He last appeared before the Supreme Court in November 2002, six months before the Senate confirmed his nomination to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am
(This is the classic nuisance case of Spur Industries v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:52 am
In Young v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 6:45 am
In Lefemine v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 12:50 am
District Court for the District of Columbia first adult porn obscenity trial for more than two decades. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:43 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. in the case General Electric Company v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 11:29 am
Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. in the case General Electric Company v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Does 1-19 (District of Columbia)Arista v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
Jason graduated with honors from West Point and holds a PhD in political science from Columbia University. [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:51 am
The “count the legislatures” approach may be a problem here, too, because 37 states and the District of Columbia allow LWOP sentences for juveniles. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am
Although 37 states and the District of Columbia permit juvenile life-without-parole sentences, he wrote that in practice the sentence is highly disfavored. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:58 am
Some 37 states, the District of Columbia and the federal government allow life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for serious juvenile offenders convicted of nonhomicide crimes. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:00 pm
Congressman Luis V. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:52 am
Opportunity Scholarship Program is or was the District of Columbia’s federally-funded school voucher program, providing $7500 in tuition per year to low-income students to attend private schools. [read post]
4 May 2010, 9:57 pm
(S.) v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh looks back at a footnote in the Court’s 2008 ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 10:07 am
(Under Young v. [read post]
