Search for: "Young v. Department Of Corrections" Results 321 - 340 of 468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2011, 4:26 pm by R Grace Rodriguez
” The Agreement included a provision stating that YAM would not “submit a Loan Application Package where the information contained in the application ... is not true, correct and undisputed and does not reflect full, correct and accurate information as the matter represented ... [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:27 am by Russ Bensing
  Last week’s solitary opinion came in Montana v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
The Bankruptcy Court corrected the error, after which the Court of Appeals resubmitted the case and reversed the judgment of the District Court. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:15 am by Viking
Robert Cone, the departing commanding general, granted a request by Maj. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 9:46 am by clayton
RESPONSE: It is no secret that I was formerly employed by the Utah Department of Corrections for sixteen years. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:59 am
"The charge of reckless homicide is a correct choice for this case, and the Palmetto Cycling Coalition is grateful for the work that the Department of Public Safety and Solicitor Strom Thurmond Jr. have done to ensure Dr. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 5:50 am by Susan Brenner
Based on your experience and training, would someone who set up a site for a young girl put their real statistics for law enforcement to find? [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Easton is correct in noting that, although the standard of proof does not depart from that of clear and convincing evidence, a party challenging validity shoulders an enhanced burden if the invalidity argument relies on the same prior art considered during examination by the U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:58 am by Susan Brenner
She did not specify which police department she called. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, 2010 U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:33 pm by Jeff Gamso
  I discussed it at length when the Supremes decided Caperton v. [read post]