Search for: "Young v. Does"
Results 321 - 340
of 5,787
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2013, 4:00 am
* Although not addressed in the decision, an appointing authority may not excess or lay a tenured employee as a subterfuge for disciplinary action [Young v Board of Education, 35 NY2d 31]. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:09 pm
Kagan criticized the young and restless Thomas Court. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:51 pm
Marsy’s Law [which requires advance notification to victims parole and related proceedings], despite its obviously expansive protection of victims’ rights does not restrict the executive’s clemency powers under California Constitution, article V, section 8, subdivision (a) or the clemency statutes, and we must affirm the judgment. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:21 pm
Most of these lawsuits are captioned as Celestial, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:37 am
Amazon * More Evidence That Print-on-Demand Vendors May Be Doomed–Greg Young Publishing v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
” Cite to Doe v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:45 pm
The young woman wanted to terminate the pregnancy and agreed to let Dr. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:59 am
If our law does approve of it, and the majority opinion cogently reasons that it does, I reluct; the law should change. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 9:30 am
Case citation: Lemmon v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:55 am
Yelp Facebook Not Liable for Account Termination–Young v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:55 am
; and (3) where does the balance of convenience lie (or what is the path of least injustice)? [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 4:06 pm
In Woodman v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:42 am
An order under section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 was held to be a more acceptable alternative to an anonymity order in a case where the protection necessary for the child’s welfare and private life does not require a restrictive order. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 2:45 pm
If it does, the outgoing governor could veto it, but the legislature may have enough votes to override it. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:09 pm
Ernst & Young case. [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:24 am
Jane Doe v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:26 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court published an opinion in Petersen v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:32 am
Lord Drummond Young considered that despite differences in the legislation involved, there were “underlying substantive similarities” with Monk v Warbey which supported the view he took of the Act. [read post]
12 May 2010, 5:56 am
People v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:43 pm
See Reisman v. [read post]
