Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 11,011
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2017, 3:09 pm
The case is styled In re Pacific Drilling S.A., et al., and is case number 17-13193 pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:09 pm
The case is styled In re Pacific Drilling S.A., et al., and is case number 17-13193 pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 3:37 pm
United States Dep't of Educ., 681 F. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 1:20 am
See Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 1:35 pm
Overwhelmingly, states across the United States have stated that it is not subject to tax. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 1:35 pm
Overwhelmingly, states across the United States have stated that it is not subject to tax. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:17 am
Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc., the case pending in the U.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:56 pm
Pressley, 430 U.S. 372, 378 & n. 11 (1977); Harrison v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:17 am
Plaintiffs filed this trademark action in 2015 against hundreds of defendants, including the H&H Defendants, alleging that they had violated Abbott’s rights by selling the international version of Abbott’s diabetes test strips in the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:17 am
Plaintiffs filed this trademark action in 2015 against hundreds of defendants, including the H&H Defendants, alleging that they had violated Abbott’s rights by selling the international version of Abbott’s diabetes test strips in the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:17 am
Plaintiffs filed this trademark action in 2015 against hundreds of defendants, including the H&H Defendants, alleging that they had violated Abbott’s rights by selling the international version of Abbott’s diabetes test strips in the United States. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:58 pm
" Access the complete opinion (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am
The injury in fact should be “actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical” (Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:02 pm
United States, No. 07-330. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 8:34 am
The court also rejects the idea that the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 5:01 am
The order: Sarrita Adams runs Science On Trial, Inc., which "provides forensic consultation services across the United States and the United Kingdom. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am
United States, in which the court reaffirmed precedent holding that prosecution of the same conduct by separate sovereigns, such as a state and the federal government, does not violate the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 12:28 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice 'Han' Ruling Means That Statute is Constitutional Under Both First Amendment, Commerce Clause United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:13 pm
Id. at *6 (quoting Lamps Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:24 am
United States Subscription Required U.S. [read post]
