Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 7,363
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 4:49 pm
Star Wars case going the other way, media and film companies certainly haven’t won each and every battle. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:32 pm
United States, where the U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 6:48 am
The case is Haraway v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 6:45 am
Kelley v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:58 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016)Part V:1. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:06 am
At CNN, Joan Biskupic explains that “[w]hat happens in [June Medical Services v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
Hein v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 5:42 am
As Justice Brennan noted in his concurring opinion in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 12:50 pm
Roe v Wade's trimester is one good example, and its stability became an open question after years of apparent precedential force. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:29 pm
John Roberts is sworn in as the 17th Chief Justice of the United States under President George W. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 12:00 pm
While accepting that there has been a shift from color-blind v. race-conscious to protect v. repair, Fleming and McClain query how “fundamental” this change is. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 4:08 pm
Moreover, the state court (Arizona) had a reasonable basis to deny the claim.U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:45 am
March 25, 2009). 230 does not preempt a state IP claim—in this case, a violation of state copyright law for pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 3:01 am
"The IPKat suspects, knowing the parties in question, that this might be yet another round in the Battle of the Bunnies, the chocolate variety at any rate.Moving with great rapidity, on Thursday 17 March the Court is holding its hearing in Case C-236/08, Google France, Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation (France) lodged on 3 June 2008. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in Mistretta v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 8:03 am
The parties are battling for control of the trademark in the US. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
In a recent case, Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:51 pm
i=11931 List of Anti Slapp Statutes by State [read post]
