Search for: "Black v. Black"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 12,691
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2017, 3:19 am
Black from 2003. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 1:57 pm
The case—Gosling Brothers Ltd. et. al. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 3:58 pm
Riley challenged this action as racially discriminatory under Batson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:14 am
The court’s 1986 Batson v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:21 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Dred Scott v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:50 am
The nightmare scenario is the famed Winnie the Pooh case in California, Stephen Schlesinger, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Could a state exclude free Blacks? [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
District Court for the Southern District of Alabama recently dismissed the EEOC’s claim that an employer’s policy prohibiting employees from wearing dreadlocks violated Title VII – the case of EEOC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:20 am
In Ocegueda v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 12:10 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 2:03 pm
Breedlove v. [read post]
New Ruling Allows for Secret Recording of Public Officials Engaged in Public Duties in Public Places
31 Jan 2019, 1:07 pm
In Martin v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:26 pm
By Michael TarrantState v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:13 pm
After the Supreme Court invalidated the use of race in college admissions in SFFA v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 3:42 pm
Batson v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 8:37 am
In Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 9:35 am
&pizza sells pizzas in elongated oval shapes, served on black, oval-shaped dishes. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:54 am
The answer is yes, according to Lord Justice Kitchin for the Court of Appeal in Specsavers & ors v Asda Stores [2014] EWCA Civ1294. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
By now most Verdict readers have probably heard about Justice Scalia’s provocative comments at last week’s oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 6:10 am
The test is whether she was "similarly situated in all material respects to individuals with whom she seeks to compare herself," as per Graham v. [read post]
