Search for: "Born v. Born"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 7,509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2011, 4:05 am
Congress passed a statute instructing the Secretary of State to permit U.S. citizens who were born in Jerusalem to list their birthplace on their passport and on their Consular Report of Birth Abroad, if they wished to do so, as "Israel." [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 4:05 am
Congress passed a statute instructing the Secretary of State to permit U.S. citizens who were born in Jerusalem to list their birthplace on their passport and on their Consular Report of Birth Abroad, if they wished to do so, as "Israel. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 5:28 am
Miller v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
Of the ones who are born alive, 95 percent of them die within the first year, and the others can be severely disabled. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:59 am
The oral arguments this week in Biden v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:03 am
J.K., M.S. was born in India in 1994. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
Two of those Justices (Thomas and Kennedy) have agreed that Blaine Amendments were “born of bigotry” and “should be buried now. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:01 pm
Meyer v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:22 pm
(born October 19, 1925) is a Lebanese American attorney and billionaire. [read post]
21 May 2007, 4:43 pm
Industrial Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 1:13 pm
One such recent case is Fuentes v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:33 pm
But the Supreme Court itself in the Plyler v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:34 pm
[6] Goulet V, King LA, Vaillant V, de Valk H. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 7:28 pm
Dobbs’ reversal of Roe v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 7:32 am
[FN] [FN] See, e.g., Ozawa v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:04 pm
Acquiescence is, in my view, a form of tacit consent, and in this regard it must, however, be borne in mind that, as WATERMEYER, C.J., said in Collen v Rietfontein Engineering Works, 1948 (1) SA 413 (AD) at p. 422:‘Quiescence is not necessarily acquiescence,’ and that ‘conduct to constitute an acceptance, must be an unequivocal indication to the other party of such acceptance".Reference was then made to the judgment in Turbek Trading CC v A & D… [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:12 am
Morley v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 3:59 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:59 pm
The court has now issued a new opinion (Apilado v. [read post]
