Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 3381 - 3400 of 9,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2017, 7:45 am
Social science and policy students are taught that the special character of law is critical for better understanding policy and distinguishing the actions of states, around which law is bound, and the lesser obligations of religion, ethics, morals, and governance (except to the extent those are operationalized as law through their incorporation within the domestic legal order of a state). [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 9:05 am
Microsoft was a third party beneficiary entitled to rely on these contracts (Microsoft Corp. v Motorola, Inc. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:15 pm by SJM
However, it would appear to be insufficient on the strength of this judgement for a Court to ignore new evidence at the warrant stage and to state, for example, that the main proportionality issues had been dealt with in the course of the possession claim.Jarnea and others v Romania (31/5/12)The applicants were owners of properties which had been let to tenants under agreements concluded with the State. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:15 pm by SJM
However, it would appear to be insufficient on the strength of this judgement for a Court to ignore new evidence at the warrant stage and to state, for example, that the main proportionality issues had been dealt with in the course of the possession claim.Jarnea and others v Romania (31/5/12)The applicants were owners of properties which had been let to tenants under agreements concluded with the State. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
See, e:g., Laub v Faessel, 297 A.D.2d 28, 31 (1st Dep’t 2002) (stating that for breach of fiduciary, “plaintiff must establish that the alleged misrepresentations or other misconduct were the direct and proximate cause of the losses claim”); Pokoik v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:48 am by David Fraser
It is reasonable to expect that an organization bound by PIPEDA will respect its statutory obligations with respect to personal information. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 1:50 pm
On 2. the Court held that, although a local authority was not bound to express its reasons for not making a nomination in every case, it was bound to give its reasons if asked. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:04 am by Frank Cranmer
In Ţîmpău v Romania [2023] ECHR 982, the applicant, Doina Ţîmpău, challenged her dismissal as a lay teacher of Orthodox religion in a public school. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 1:02 pm
One cert petition that is missing, but may still be worth watching, is a cert petition in Williams v. [read post]