Search for: "C/T"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 50,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2014, 10:26 am
Hope springs eternal, I guess.Defendants also argued that their uses were excepted from dilution liability by § 1125(c)(3). [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 7:08 am
The fact that Clorox knew of C&D’s earlier Lanham Act lawsuits was irrelevant; the statute specifically contemplated notice by the buyer. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
Some would say if you’re successful with arbitrary or fanciful, you’re in the best possible shape b/c you’ll get the best strength. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 3:31 pm
c. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:36 am
Note that the Board also does not mention T 1989/18 of 16.12.2021 that concluded that, as a general rule, not is not required to bring the description in line with (amended) claims intended for grant.Summary of Facts and SubmissionsI. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:26 pm
That leaves a bit of a bad taste already, doesn’t it? [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:40 am
We weren’t too impressed with W&C’s immediate response. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
A: think it doesn’t matter b/c we still get the benefits [that happens all the time in traditional expressive media: biographies or magazine articles taking advantage of something popular, and we think that’s a good thing]. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am
In a another Board decision (T 777/15), this was denied. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 6:09 pm
C: And I don’t mind you trying to raise money. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:01 am
Cushman decided to concentrate resources on C-wing. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 7:48 am
We don’t have definite caselaw. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
” But this is smoke and mirrors: they claim rights b/c it’s authentic and it’s authentic b/c they claim rights. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm
80% didn’t know the state law; majority didn’t know if noncompetes were enforceable; actual signing wasn’t more likely to occur in enforcing states than nonenforcing; even among CEOs, 60% in California were required to sign noncompetes. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 5:25 am
The father didn't fare any better. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:00 pm
Of course, it didn't last. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:51 am
PatentsAn anonymous Katfriend reported on the oral proceedings in the consolidated appeal of the cases on the Broad Institute's European platform patents for CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology (T 2360/19, T 2516/19 and T 2689/19). [read post]
27 May 2015, 10:09 am
She didn't have to answer every call, just the ones she didn't know who was calling. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 9:10 am
”accused SBM trade dress--I really can't see substantial similarity of protectable expression here; this seems to conflate (c) and TMThe court doesn't separately deal with the copyright claim over the yellow barrier design, which to me clearly falls on the idea side of the idea/expression line:False advertising: Scotts challenged SBM’s advertising statements that its Brush Killer Product kills brush for up to 12 months, protects for up to 12 months,… [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 10:43 pm
” "And payers such as workers compensation and property and casualty insurance (P&C) do have a vested interest in the detail and specificity provided by ICD-10, mandate or no. [read post]
