Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 34,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2022, 8:07 am
(Almond Alliance of California v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 5:21 am
Blackwell v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 9:59 pm
The case is unusual in at least three respects: the inventor is a lawyer, not a scientist; the patents are substantially prophetic in a technology that is heavily dependent on experimental results; and the dispute was resolved not on the basis of a patent law issue but with the Federal Circuit interpreting the provisions of California employment law. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:03 pm
California law on the issue is indeed unclear. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 11:44 am
Colleen V. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:05 am
In the case below, decided by a California appellate court under the name Huber v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 6:43 am
In the recent case of Atalla v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
In Dennis v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 11:55 am
Reich v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:00 pm
In a case titled Chau v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:05 am
The cleanup continues with NIFLA v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 9:16 am
In Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:03 pm
CBD oil was downgraded to a Schedule V last year (and was later descheduled by the 2018 Farm Bill). [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 12:15 am
But here is some fresh ammo for parties and litigants with an interest in strict application of the rules: Felton-Shepherd Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
Early in his law career, Sam co-authored Patt v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 12:47 pm
This is the story behind the filing of Perry v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
Ctr. v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 5:34 pm
The bad included Plessy v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 11:03 am
The Lynberg & Watkins Employment Law Blog will of course tackle this important decision and provide important practical tips to employers to ensure they have the tools to remain in compliance with California’s complicated and ever-changing system of wage and hour laws. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 11:57 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. [read post]