Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 3381 - 3400 of 22,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2014, 5:11 pm by Epstein Becker Green
Olsen The United States Supreme Court declined to review the Second Circuit’s decision in Irizarry v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 7:38 pm by David E. Bernstein
For examples of state courts upholding child labor laws within a few years of the Lochner decision, see Ex Parte Weber, 149 Cal. 392 (1906); United Steel Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Section 7511(a) of Article 75 the New York State Civil Practice Law and Rules [CPLR] provides, in pertinent part, that "[a]n application to vacate or modify an [arbitrator's] award may be made by a party within ninety days after its delivery to him". [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Section 7511(a) of Article 75 the New York State Civil Practice Law and Rules [CPLR] provides, in pertinent part, that "[a]n application to vacate or modify an [arbitrator's] award may be made by a party within ninety days after its delivery to him". [read post]
District Court for the State of Maine issued an order granting a  motion to suppress evidence in United States of America v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:10 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:24 pm
Last week, a United States District Court Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued one of the few decisions thus far to analyze the reach of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:07 pm
At least for Mushegh Minasyan, who was statutorily required to file his application for asylum within one year of his arrival in the United States on April 9, 2001 and who filed on April 9, 2002. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:13 am by Dennis Crouch
Question presented: Should the Court grant the petition, vacate the judgment below, and remand to dismiss the appeal as moot, in accordance with United States v. [read post]
Supreme Court itself recognized, "state courts are absolutely free to interpret state constitutional provisions to accord greater protection to individual rights than do similar provisions of the United States Constitution….The modification or reformulation of a privacy test is possible, thus, at the state level. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:52 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Next Wednesday is Dog Sniff day at the Supreme Court, when the Court will hear oral argument in Florida v. [read post]