Search for: "Doe v. Smith" Results 3381 - 3400 of 7,275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
That’s what a Minnesota statute — now being challenged before the Minnesota Court of Appeals — does: Subdivision 1. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:50 am by Peter Mahler
Platkin decided Flink v Smith, 2020 NY Slip Op 50305(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Feb. 7, 2020], involving a dispute between former law partners following the collapse of their PLLC known as Flink Smith Law (FSL). [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 12:05 pm by Amy Howe
Smith (April 17): When the statute of limitations begins to run for a federal civil rights claim alleging that prosecutors fabricated evidence in a criminal proceeding Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 8:36 am by Sharon Bradford Franklin
In addition to the “voluntary disclosure” aspect of the third-party doctrine, the Supreme Court’s opinion in Smith v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Smith:   Smith had lost his first appeal, then in Son of State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:11 pm
People v Myles, 58 AD3d 889, 890-892 [3d Dept 2009] [a consumer of electricity could be guilty of falsifying business records for bypassing the electric meter, causing it to falsely record the amount of electricity used]; People v Johnson, 39 AD3d 338, 339 [1st Dept 2007] [a co-defendant of public assistance applicant could be guilty of falsifying business records of the agency]; People v Smith, 300 AD2d 1145, 1146 [4th Dept 2002] [defendant could be… [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 2:54 pm by Jo Ann Hoffman & Associates, P.A.
(Fla 1st DCA 2013) Payment of medical bills for a workers compensation injury are outside the JCC jurisdiction per JBD Brothers and Masonry v Miranda, 25 So.3rd 1271 (1st DCA 2010) JCC has no jurisdiction over retaliatory discharge issues per Smith v Piez Technology, 427 So.2d 182 (Fla 1983). [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 11:53 am
Ninth Circuit Holds that Single Sale on eBay Does Not Provide Sufficient Minimum Contacts with Buyer's State. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
 * Laura Smith-Hewitt… is categorically is an examiner -- some readers should get over it. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 12:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) The opinion, by an Illinois trial court, is at Morr-Fitz, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
In Mosley at para 229 Eady J directed himself to take into account awards in defamation cases, and referred also to Gleaner Company Ltd v Abrahams [2004] 1 AC 628. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
A claim of double jeopardy is sometimes encountered in efforts to suppress a disciplinary action in situations were the charges reflect the same acts or omissions that were the subject of counseling memoranda or performance evaluations.The courts have rejected this theory.** In Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98, the Court of Appeals said that including charges concerning performance that were addressed in a counseling memorandum was not “double jeopardy. [read post]