Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 3381 - 3400 of 8,633
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2016, 6:06 pm by Justin A
Interestingly, Westlaw includes the superior letter in Hood v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 1:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
I’m delighted to report that the Michigan Court of Appeals has just upheld a Twitter parodist’s First Amendment claim in the “badass lawyer” case, Levitt v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:43 am by Jamie Markham
A resident superior court judge for the county in which the defendant was convicted performs the review. [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:43 am by Jamie Markham
A resident superior court judge for the county in which the defendant was convicted performs the review. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:35 am by Eugene Volokh
If Serafinowicz posts anything about Bernstein, he will be in violation of a court order and could be thrown in jail for contempt of court. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:05 am by Shea Denning
If the State does not dispute the district court’s factual findings, the superior court does not hold a new evidentiary hearing. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:05 am by Shea Denning
If the State does not dispute the district court’s factual findings, the superior court does not hold a new evidentiary hearing. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:30 pm by Ad Law Defense
Superior Court, 42 Cal. 4th 443 (Cal. 2007), the California Supreme Court held that a class-action waiver in an employment contract was unenforceable when the waiver would prevent employees from vindicating their rights. [read post]
10 May 2016, 12:11 pm by Arianne Bouchard
In a recent decision[1], the Superior Court of Quebec held that the termination of a fixed term contract of employment constitutes a breach of contract which may allow for an award of damages for “troubles and inconveniences” suffered by the employee, in addition to damages for early termination. [read post]
9 May 2016, 10:44 pm by Evan M. Levow
A defendant recently argued to the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division that a criminal DWLS charge should not apply to him because only one prior DWI conviction was from New Jersey, and the statute therefore does not allow courts to consider out-of-state convictions. [read post]