Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 3381 - 3400 of 16,618
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Under CMS’ current policy, a displaced resident does not include: (i) a resident who left his/her GME program to continue training at another hospital before the actual closure of the originating hospital or program; (ii) a resident who is assigned to and training at planned rotations at other hospitals, who does not return for training at the originating hospital or program the day before or day of hospital or program closure; and (iii) a medical student (i.e., prospective… [read post]
18 May 2020, 2:45 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
[Does the text of Title VII prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or transgender status?] [read post]
18 May 2020, 5:00 am by Catherine V. Wadhwani
The memo does not grant a reprieve to employers with regard to H-1B requirements; these responsibilities remain in effect even during the effective dates of the temporary flexibility policy. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:42 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
" So what does it take for a court to grant the government "leave" to dismiss the indictment? [read post]
15 May 2020, 11:52 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
This trend seems to have benefited by the enactment of Immigration and Nationality Act § 214(c)(10) which allows H-1B employers to dispense with the filing of a new or amended petition following a corporate restructuring if a “new corporate entity succeeds to the interests and obligations of the original petitioning employer . . . [read post]
15 May 2020, 11:52 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
This trend seems to have benefited by the enactment of Immigration and Nationality Act § 214(c)(10) which allows H-1B employers to dispense with the filing of a new or amended petition following a corporate restructuring if a “new corporate entity succeeds to the interests and obligations of the original petitioning employer . . . [read post]
14 May 2020, 10:20 am by Amy L. Peck and Michael H. Neifach
It is possible OMB is telling the Administration the Rule does not make sense from an economic standpoint – even during high unemployment and the Administration’s other ongoing efforts to limit immigration. [read post]