Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 3381 - 3400 of 15,460
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2021, 3:57 pm by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
With this in mind, let us turn to Art. 15a RPBA and G 1/21. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
” Residents of a Contracting Party are clearly within the “jurisdiction” of that Contracting Party for purposes of Article 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:09 pm by Shea Denning
The Court of Appeals found no error. (1) The Highway Patrol trooper who arrested the defendant testified about his training in the administration of the horizontal gaze nystagmus test (HGN) for the detection of impairment and the interpretation of the results on the test. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Although both the High Court and the Court of Appeal agreed that Mr Corbyn’s statement was defamatory at common law, the same statement will now be subject to the higher statutory bar set out at section 1(1) of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:49 am by skelly
” ELANY Advocacy Efforts: ELANY is advocating for three new excess (surplus) line placement reforms: (1) The Excess Line Diligent Effort and Affidavit Modernization; (2) The Medical Malpractice Excess Line Reform; and (3) The Insurability of Punitive Damages. [read post]
5 May 2021, 10:01 am by Monica Williamson
See posts from April 23, 2021. [read post]
4 May 2021, 6:13 am by Shannon O'Hare
Notice by a bailiff (huissier) is no longer required for transfers under credit agreements entered into post-1 October 2016. [read post]
4 May 2021, 3:21 am by CMS
Procedural history At first instance, lawfulness of both dividends was unsuccessfully challenged under Companies Act 2006, Pt 23 and was not subsequently appealed. [read post]
3 May 2021, 9:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
Here, SSE failed to meet its burden, and the Court rejected its argument that general plan “consistency” and “inconsistency” for CEQA purposes means something different than it does under the Planning and Zoning Law. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 3:08 pm by Jeffrey Carr
Lie #1: The Tort System Doesn't Cost Businesses $300,400,000,000.00 a Year Let's use the U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 1:19 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the April 1, April 16 and April 23 conferences) Doe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:56 am by Daniel Jin
Authored by Francesca Cassidy-Taylor On Friday 23 April, the Court of Appeal delivered judgment in R v Umerji [2021] EWCA Crim 598. [read post]