Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 4,619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2013, 8:03 pm
Key ideals about Part III 1. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:52 am
Hogg, of Osgoode Hall Law School at York University (Toronto), in, Constitutional Law of Canada 5th Edition (Thomson Canada Limited, 2007) Volume 1, sections 5.5(c), and 8.8, (see also the abridged Student Edition 2015, however on these issues, it does not appear to alter what is stated in Professor Hogg’s main work). [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Part 1 of PIPEDA (privacy-“Protection of Personal Information”), s. 5, does the same thing—it basis a whole body of laws upon compliance with a National Standard of Canada, the, Model Code for the Protection of Personal Information, CAN/CSA-Q830-96 (in Schedule 1 of PIPEDA). [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:17 am
The present document does not affect immovable property. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am
Narayaniah AIR 1914 PC 41 the infants had been residing in the district of Chingleput in the Madras Presidency. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 3:19 am
So he does a lot with the supernatural, which Marlene Gebauer 1:17 Yeah, we’ll send me the link. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
The following categories were used by eGT: Peer Group#1: DMEPOS Supplier Not Likely to Have Orthotist Training Medicare Specialty Code Medicare Provider / Supplier Type Description A6 Medical Supply Co. with Respiratory Therapist B1 Oxygen Supplier 54 Medical Supply Co. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am
The new VMT methodology will not be mandatory until July 1, 2020, unless implemented early by a lead agency, as has been done by the City of San Francisco. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am
This is because the Criminal Code does not use the terms ‘heritage’ or ‘monument’ in the articles related to cultural heritage[22] (Articles 205, 218, 219 and 222), as prescribed in the Cultural Heritage Protection Act (2008).[23] Therefore, the courts must determine the value in each case on a case-by-case basis and then decide on the penalty. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
’”[19] The Court held “[t]hat a claim is fact-intensive does not preclude dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) if the plaintiff fails to allege facts plausibly supporting a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am
This is because the Criminal Code does not use the terms ‘heritage’ or ‘monument’ in the articles related to cultural heritage[22] (Articles 205, 218, 219 and 222), as prescribed in the Cultural Heritage Protection Act (2008).[23] Therefore, the courts must determine the value in each case on a case-by-case basis and then decide on the penalty. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:11 am
”9 However, an employer may “make preemployment inquiries into the ability of an applicant to perform job related functions”10 and may also “require a medical examination after an offer of employment has been made to a job applicant and prior to the commencement of the employment duties of such applicant, and may condition an offer of employment on the results of such examination”11 so long as: 1) “all entering employees are… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:35 am
”[3] Opponents argue that because the primary function of cheerleading is not competition, it does not meet the qualifications of a sport.[4] The answer to this debate depends on your definition of a sport.[5] The NCAA, the U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm
Here, the record does not reflect an abuse of that discretion. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
By Diane G. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:43 am
The government has taken the position that once the search warrant has been issued, courts cannot manage how the government conducts the search.[1] The government has strenuously opposed courts conditioning search warrants on the government providing search protocols for the review of electronic data, and has also resisted providing courts with a time range in which the search will be completed.[2] The government has also tried to defend, albeit unsuccessfully, a search of… [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Here are five unanswered questions from Ramos. 1. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
I agree with Baert that the case presents issues of national and public importance, including: 1. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 6:34 pm
Article 1 (¶1.4). [read post]
