Search for: "Does v. United States of America"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 4,684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
How does section 1021 of the NDAA affect this dispute? [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:01 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 2:45 am
AFTRA is a member of the AFL-CIO, which is the largest federation of unions in the United States with over 10 million members. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:05 pm
Accordingly, the slight differences in actions and words of Obama v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:39 am
However, that effort was struck down by Federal courts only a day or two after the election (Awad v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:11 am
What does that even mean? [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:17 am
Stein filed the first lawsuit against Bank of America that came to be know as a “mass joinder,” or multi-plaintiff suit… Ronald v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
And what does it mean to succeed? [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 12:27 am
("Acceding" to the national constitution and canons does not mean subordinating oneself to them, any more than the United States of America, by acceding to Charter of the United Nations, places itself under the absolute governance of that body.) [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Today’s case of the day, Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm
The verb “abridge” is used as a synonym for discrimination in exactly this way in the Fifteenth Amendment which says “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:34 am
Supreme Court held in Gregg v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
United States of America, — F.3d —-, 2011 WL 5865225 (5th Cir. 2011). [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
It’s another for the government that runs a massive special interest state to either decide who gets to speak (e.g., academics, newspaper editors, bloggers, “public interest groups” [update: and other members of the “cognitive elite,” whose average views diverge dramatically from public median]) and who does not (for-profit corporations and unions [update: or just ordinary citizens who band together via a PAC]), or to decide what the content of… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
It’s another for the government that runs a massive special interest state to either decide who gets to speak (e.g., academics, newspaper editors, bloggers, “public interest groups” [update: and other members of the “cognitive elite,” whose average views diverge dramatically from public median]) and who does not (for-profit corporations and unions [update: or just ordinary citizens who band together via a PAC]), or to decide what the content of one’s speech will be… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 10:59 am
Note that United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
Patchak (Granted )Docket: 11-246Issue(s): (1) Whether the Quiet Title Act and its reservation of the United States' sovereign immunity in suits involving "trust or restricted Indian lands" apply to all suits concerning land in which the United States "claims an interest," 28 U.S.C. [read post]
