Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2014, 6:17 am
(See Nelson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:24 am
Although the Court doubted that the courts today would have invented such a rule, they accepted that the doctrine is a long-standing principle of English law, is common to almost all major systems of law, and that judicial abolishment would be inconsistent with the way the English common law system works. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
Vaughan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
The English courts have been grappling with how far to take this. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:53 am
At first instance, Arnold J followed two first instance English Court decisions which suggest that the transfer of equitable title is sufficient (KCI v Smith & Nephew [2010] and HTC v Gemalto [2013]). [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 2:35 pm
On May 16, 2016, the United States Supreme Court in Husky International Electronics v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:03 pm
To conclude, does it mean that the English High Court in Davis (discussed here) was right? [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 2:35 pm
On May 16, 2016, the United States Supreme Court in Husky International Electronics v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:26 am
In Singleton v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:48 am
AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551 (12 May 2011) ? [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:53 am
CLS Bank Int’l. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 5:39 pm
As Sir Robin Jacob stated at the 27th Fordham IP Conference, doctrines of exhaustion of IP rights were unknown in English law and instead it was always considered that an implied licence to resell ran with the patented or copyright ‘goods’. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:55 am
In 1964 (and indeed until the 2000s), and in some states until the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 9:10 am
” Sansone v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:23 pm
For example, in Lucasfilm v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39 the Supreme Court held that acts of copyright infringement in a non-EU country under foreign copyrights can be determined by the English courts. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 2:41 pm
City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998) and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 am
Reversed a district court holding that would have allowed Ohio State football player Maurice Clarett to enter the NFL draft early.Williams v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 2:39 am
DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Criminal Practice
Court Dismisses Indictment Charging Sex Offender With SORNA Breach Arising From Move to New Jersey
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 3:17 am
In the case of Perry v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Coln v. [read post]
