Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 7,488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm
Lexmark and Microsoft v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:41 pm
Via Eugene Volokh, the issue arose in a California case, People v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 6:13 pm
From Burghardt v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 5:42 pm
It is fair to expect that the justices will have a good time with this one on Tuesday. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 6:59 am
The most recent of which, Robert Heath v. [read post]
9 Jul 2006, 10:00 am
Recall the 2002 Ninth Circuit decision that First Amendment rights of physicians meant the federal government couldn't revoke the drug licenses of California physicians who recommended marijuana to their patients (Conant v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:41 pm
Related Cases: Automated License Plate Readers- ACLU of Southern California & EFF v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
There has been a lot written about what impact the Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:39 pm
In 1967, we represented Mildred and Richard Loving in their successful fight to end state bans on inter-racial marriage, in the landmark case Loving v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
The ABA has been very successful in persuading the state courts; the only significant holdout is California. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 5:49 am
In Holder v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Johnson forAmici Curiae United Trustee’s Association and California Mortgage Association.Leland Chan for Amicus Curiae California Bankers Association.I. [read post]
29 May 2009, 5:39 am
Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
; (3) the ALI recommends that attorneys’ fees be calculated as a percentage of the actual value received by a class in a claims-made settlement, not the projected value if everyone in the class made a claim, which has been implemented in California state court (I think this is a very good idea). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
Last December, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a first Office action tentatively rejecting all claims of the "Steve Jobs patent", U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 5:30 am
As the Court of Appeal in Vescovi v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 10:12 am
Jeong v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 12:11 am
The Business Judgment Rule, simply stated, is that the good faith business decisions of a board, if within the authority granted to the board, will not be unduly scrutinized by the courts. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Two of the decisions come from the Northern District of California: Opperman v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:49 pm
On Monday, in Martel v. [read post]
