Search for: "He v. Holder" Results 3381 - 3400 of 5,731
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2016, 1:21 pm by Jason Gerken
He urged a narrow interpretation of the “without authorization” provision: “a person accesses an account ‘without authorization’ if he does so without having the permission of either the system owner or a legitimate account holder. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
To date, responses of AI builders and sellers to these issues vary from ignoring them, to attempting negotiations with certain parties, to lawsuits, but to my knowledge (and to the knowledge of experts I’ve spoken with), no definitive solutions have been established, and some contend these conversations are just beginning.[5] Challenges include finding solutions to data scraping for training AI models that both fairly address the interests of rights holders and data subjects,… [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Indeed, it has been held that one may assume a duty, which initially did not exist, and may be held liable where his or her affirmative action adversely affected that plaintiff and he or she failed to act reasonably (see Arroyo v We Transport,  Inc., 118 AD3d 648, 649 [2d Dept 2014]; Gordon v Muchnik, 180 AD2d 715 [2d Dept 1992]). [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:51 pm by Anna Gelpern
I am just back from joining 250+ other obsessed (and some paid) persons at the second Second Circuit hearing on the pari passu clause in NML v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
This oft-cited dictum from United States v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Guyana The former Attorney-General Anil Nandlall is suing the current holder of the office, Basil Williams, for an allegation that law reports for personal use were bought with public funds. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:43 pm by Hans von Spakovsky
Along with John Fund, he is the co-author of “Who’s Counting? [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Note that subsections (a), (b) and (c) provide for specific exceptions to the general rule. [4] See Spanski Enterprises, Inc v IMB+ Records Inc, 2013 ONSC 5382 at para 6; Allarco Entertainment 2008 Inc v Staples Canada ULC, 2021 ABQB 340 at para 19; Sony Music Entertainment Canada Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
This was the point Justice Breyer made in his Brunetti concurrence, where he argued that “[t]he First Amendment is not the Tax Code. [read post]