Search for: "Head v. The University"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 3,691
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2008, 7:28 am
"In Noffke v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 7:27 pm
As the second book in the Bright Idea series we have Trade Secrets, Law and Practice (Oxford University Press). [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 1:25 pm
In Conradt v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:09 pm
"lower tier" (whatever those terms are thought to mean); or relatively rich v. poor schools (might correlate with previous category); or independent schools v. those affiliated with a larger university; or other factors? [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 7:48 am
Gordon and Tracy V. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:07 am
How can I not think of my personal ability to choose and thus my personal choices as being the product of the fortune of being born in America, and the fortune of being born in a post-Loving v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:15 am
Polaris IP, LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Partner Thomas Allingham II, who works out of the firm's Wilmington office, will head the Skadden team in Delaware. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 6:00 pm
Presumably, he would disagree with the determination in CA v. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
o SCOTUS docket hereBowie v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 4:45 pm
(University of Denver Sturm College of Law) has posted Returning Fairness to Executive Compensation on SSRN. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:08 pm
As you know, on November 24th, in one of the "John Doe" cases targeting Boston University, consolidated under the heading London-Sire Records v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 4:21 pm
In one of the "John Doe" cases targeting Boston University, consolidated under the heading London-Sire Records v. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 5:23 pm
Burke v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
(Morales v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 4:27 am
posted at Marquette University Law School Faculty Blog, we get a discussion of District Attorney's Office v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 3:01 pm
In many respects, the risk-benefit test stood products liability law on its head. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:10 am
(Techdirt) Harvard’s Charlie Nesson raises Constitutional questions in RIAA litigation (ZDNet Government) Head’s up RIAA: engage these kids passions: don’t sue your market for heaven’s sake (IP ADR Blog) Electronic Arts sued repeatedly of DRM (Techdirt) (Ars Technica) United Features realises that setting comics free online makes sense (Techdirt) Do the new SEC rules on linking violate section 230 safe harbours? [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
Beauchamp, Oxford University Press, alongside a paper of mine in which I sympathize with many of her major conclusions and with her critique of Utilitarianism, but then reflect on subtle differences between her Kantian position and my own neo-Aristotelian position. [read post]
