Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
In 1965, in Griswold v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 3:57 pm
The Fifth Circuit has held that the whole "ratio" thing doesn't apply when only nominal damages are awarded, and I (alongside Judge Hurwitz) find that view somewhat sympathetic. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 8:00 am
In an important decision that will have profound implications for media reporting as well as for individuals subject to criminal investigation, the Supreme Court has today held that, as a legitimate starting point, a person under criminal investigation has a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of information relating to that investigation (ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] UKSC 5). [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:08 am
Schad v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:24 am
HELD- All three appeals dismissed The Unduly Harsh Test The meaning of the unduly harsh test was previously considered by the Supreme Court in KO (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] UKSC 53, which the Secretary of State submitted the Court of Appeal failed to follow in HA/RA. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:23 am
The United States Supreme Court held that California’s exercise of jurisdiction violated BMS’s due process rights. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
In MA (Pakistan) [2016] EWCA Civ 705 (discussed here), the court held that where s 117B(6) applies, Parliament had stated that the public interest does not require the person’s removal and the result (i.e. non-removal) has already been predetermined. [read post]
15 May 2008, 6:07 am
In Capitol v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:23 am
Held: The Supreme Court agrees with the decisions made by the Court of Appeals. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 10:32 am
Now, the Ninth Circuit held in 2001 -- in a ruling identical to the holding of every other court to consider the issue -- that state bar cost awards were dischargeable. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 5:39 pm
” The Court explained that this standing requirement is very easy to meet, and as it held in Kim v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:24 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 2:41 am
Continue reading The post MVA v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 2:41 am
Continue reading The post MVA v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:51 pm
Beyond Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 12:51 pm
See Sheehan v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 4:39 pm
In Norman v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 7:39 am
United States, this Court held that part of a federal law's definition of "violent felony" was impermissibly vague. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:45 am
Carl v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:45 pm
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
