Search for: "In re T. W."
Results 3381 - 3400
of 8,740
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2016, 12:29 pm
Fortunately, if you’re a Harvard alumnus, you can do something about it: vote for a slate of candidates for Harvard’s Board of Overseers. [read post]
8 May 2016, 12:20 pm
As Susan Crawford once said “[On the Internet, w]e could avoid [government]. [read post]
8 May 2016, 12:20 pm
As Susan Crawford once said “[On the Internet, w]e could avoid [government]. [read post]
8 May 2016, 9:45 am
It just wasn’t very classy. [read post]
7 May 2016, 4:12 am
During President George W. [read post]
6 May 2016, 1:19 pm
But John Roberts was selected by President George W. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:51 pm
Disturbing: end run—we’re not really talking about free speech. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm
We’re all miserable. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Rasenberger: they’d have to be part of the service, which they’re not. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:11 pm
We’re selling tech short if we don’t think we can come up w/something better than fingerprinting. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:20 pm
Walker: more licensing: in our conversations w/Apples & Spotifys their #1 complaint is that they’re competing w/free. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm
And he didn’t just look, he touched. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
512(m) doesn’t prohibit action taken after you’re informed of such infringement. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm
Artstor couldn’t have created this w/o DMCA safe harbor. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Most of our members are 1-2 person studios w/o that manpower; mostly they can’t even ID who they’re after. [read post]
1 May 2016, 11:54 am
Then bring them into conversation w/1A theories. [read post]
1 May 2016, 11:07 am
Platforms have become good at moderation of TOS-violating content; they’re much better than the gov’t, and also unlike the gov’t they’re allowed to do it. [read post]
1 May 2016, 8:55 am
What’s the interaction w/national security law where there’s basically nothing stopping the gov’t from surveilling right now, it turns out? [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:32 am
There is also a real, unexamined problem w/r/t focusing so much on gov’t purpose when deciding when a law is constitutional, a problem recognized in other areas of const’l law. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 3:28 pm
Consumer protection: doesn’t divest gov’t of regulatory power, but burden of proof rests w/gov’t. [read post]
