Search for: "Jones v. State"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 6,828
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2013, 9:36 am
He lamented the uncertainty created by the US Supreme Court's odd ruling in US v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:01 am
Then, in Katz v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 10:05 pm
For example, at my office I can use my PC to create a folder called "Smith v Jones" and move over my files — correspondence, pleadings, research, etc. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm
Jones and California Department of Corrections v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 7:19 am
It often seems that the plaintiff lawyers work from the same playbook, written, we suspect, by Velvet Jones. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:10 am
App. 1984); Jones v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:28 am
“The analysis appears to be very similar to the approach that was taken in [Canada (Human Rights Commission) v.] [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:33 am
Jones, 9 NY3d 259, 262, 848 NYS2d 600 (2007), citing People v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 3:06 am
Similar to its federal counterpart, Indiana Rule of Evidence 803(1) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A statement describing or explaining a material event, condition or transaction, made while the declarant was perceiving the event, condition or... [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 3:18 am
Rev. 1-34 (2012) Introduction: The Jones Act seaman has de facto power over whether a jury will hear his claim through his ability, under Panama Railroad v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 12:25 pm
Jones (Western State College of Law) has posted "Questioning a Juvenile's Capacity for Criminal Liability in Street Gangs Post-J.D.B. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:30 am
Jones are wrong about the state of the law in 1791. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
Archbold 4-447 (f) suggests that where asked a judge should offer an explanation: “a reasonable doubt is the sort of doubt that might affect the mind of the of a person in dealing with matters of importance in his own affairs” Walters v R. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm
Robert V. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
Also, King involves privacy in new technologies The nine-to-zero vote in the recent GPS decision, United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:30 pm
Crawley v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am
Duncan/Jones Day Designated Professor of Law at Ohio State University Moritz College of Law and Senior Fellow at Election Law @ Moritz. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:16 am
Research Affiliates, LLC v Commissioner of Patents [2013] FCA 71* (13 February 2013)* At the time of writing, the decision is not yet published on AustLII. [read post]
