Search for: "Kat"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 6,611
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2014, 5:30 am
Bell Mobility, 2014 FC 555 (CanLII) http://t.co/Jtj7TrZqVv – Bell ordered to pay privacy damages -> Hollywood Guilds Want Supreme Court to Hear Marvel Characters Dispute https://t.co/ldKr6xowuU -> CRTC releases new Anti-Spam Legislation guidelines http://t.co/S5Q65ZWPGh -> Shariah Law Fatwa on Copyright: “the guilty should be punished…” http://t.co/nQKWYmxCuJ -> SUPER KAT-EXCLUSIVE: here’s Commission’s draft White Paper on EU copyright… [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:31 am
This Kat is not a US attorney; nor is he a specialist in computer implemented inventions, so he hesitated to write a report of the US Supreme Court decision Alice Corp. v CLS Bank International, which has attracted a lot of comment from the brief mention in Friday Fantasies. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:19 am
This Kat suspects that he has not heard the last of this action ... [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm
[After seeing a ghost] Kat: Dad, I’m sorry. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:20 am
The proposed next steps thus take these differences into account.Classic Kat-drama: why can't you watch MasterChef Italia outside Italy? [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:12 am
The other Jeremy ...A couple of days ago this Kat's attention was drawn to the now famous mugshot of California-based "blue-eyed gang member" Jeremy Meeks. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 3:48 am
Google has indicated that it intends to appeal.This Kat will be watching closely for the outcome of any appeal, as well as for the result of the litigation over the substantive issues. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:59 am
This Kat has recently received an email from a young friend of his, a fellow blogger to boot, who writes:Every firm should have one"I am an LLB (Hons) and a LLM graduate. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 1:25 am
This Kat does not know about other Kat readers, but criminal extortion has never been part of his IP practitioner’s playbook. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 1:17 pm
Failure is always an option here - there's a learning curve for all of this, and we will get pricing wrong before we get it right (but as Kat Cole said during her speech, the faster we fail, the faster we succeed). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:31 am
Publishers II Speaking of "limited neighbouring right[s] to stop unlicensed use of snippets", IPKat readers will remember that last year Germany introduced a piece of legislation known as Leistungsschutzrecht für Presseverlege (LSR) that created a neighbouring right over news content [this Kat is not a great fan of this sort of initiatives, as explained here]. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:10 am
This moggy was delighted that, unlike the Advocate General's decision (reported by the IPKat courtesy of Paul England of Taylor Wessing here), it is available in English, allowing this Kat to digest it at much greater speed.The short answer is "yes", a safener can be the subject of an SPC. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:56 am
This Kat has already made his feelings known, but will repeat them for what he hopes will be the final time since many of his email correspondents, friends and others appear to have missed his point. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:19 am
This Kat and Merpel agree that this gives us legal certainty - whether it is always fair is another question. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
Going through his file of items to blog which have fallen behind in his priority list, this Kat has just rediscovered another decision that troubled him when he first spotted it -- not because it was wrong [for a change, mumbles Merpel], but rather because the process of reaching the correct outcome was so long and tortuous, spanning over decade, in respect of a trade mark which this Kat doubts was worth effort given the unlikelihood that it will be used other than in… [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 6:46 pm
Unlike those who issue groundless threats, Kats don't pull punches. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:29 am
Nor had this Kat, till a day or two ago. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:34 am
files where the use in question is approved by the rightholders and not paid for by the customer (licensed content, for example, in connection with a marketing action);Clearly not a Nokia phone,but at least a Kat coverc. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:11 am
This Kat has been following with great interest (and indeed some personal stake) the question of who will be entitled to represent before the Unified Patent Court (see for example previous post here). [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:01 pm
(This Kat was not able to find a link to the text of the article, but there is a version of the article that is available for Kat readers on ssrn.com, here.) [read post]
