Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2011, 3:35 am
It's an attack on money itself, the Buckly v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:58 am
Readers may recall that this is the case in which Lord Justice Jacob, as he then was, trenchantly stated that " ... if Neurim are wrong, then the Regulation will not have achieved its key objects for large areas of pharmaceutical research: it will not be fit for purpose. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:47 am
Lord Gerrarrdus of Luton@Gerrarrdus paraphrases this as: “Where because of last Sunday you move this Saturday to next Tuesday. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 7:53 pm
In the US, it was found in the 1990s that a prohibition on automatic telephone direct marketing that applied to political campaigning was constitutional: the case is Van Bergen v Minnesota 59 F.3d 1541 (8th Circuit CA). [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
As Lord Henry Brougham declared and the Supreme Court of Canada embraced in R v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:56 pm
Such, also, was the Declaration of Right presented by the Lords and Commons to the Prince of Orange in 1688, and afterwards thrown into the form of an act of parliament called the Bill of Rights. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:17 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts: More secret justice on the horizon Angus McCullough QC special advocate for Russian cleared of spying in deportation case Secret evidence v open justice: the current state of play 9/11 ten years on Even more secret evidence for government in Al Rawi case Mutual confidentiality between intelligence services trumped by open justice requirements [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:01 am
Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000, which permitted suspicionless stops and searches to be carried out by the police in connection with counter-terrorism policing, was declared illegal by the ECHR in Gillan and Quinton v UK. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm
” He also referred to the Flood v Times case, on its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
” The hearings and proceedings in the immigration courts raise one of the highest of stakes, deportation (or as it’s technically termed, removal) from the United States, a process which the Supreme Court in Fong Haw Tan v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
” The hearings and proceedings in the immigration courts raise one of the highest of stakes, deportation (or as it’s technically termed, removal) from the United States, a process which the Supreme Court in Fong Haw Tan v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:57 am
GangulySupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in Remdeo Chauhan @ Rajnath Chauhan v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:08 am
In Associated Hotels of India Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm
The effect of s97 is limited to the life of proceedings (Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878, [2007] 1 FLR 1). [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
At that time Colorado had two strong Defense of Marriage provisions, one in the Constitution and the other statutory, not only barring the celebration of same-sex marriages in the state but denying in-state recognition to valid out-of-state same-sex marriages.[4] The federal government had its own DOMA.[5] But Massachusetts had recognized same-sex marriage.[6]Phillips met with them personally and, when he heard that the cake was intended as a celebration… [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
It follows the May 2021 ruling of the District Court of The Hague in Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:41 pm
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:11 am
Marques v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:06 pm
In addition to requiring the state to inform it of just satisfaction to individual applicants, the member state is required to implement general measures to ensure future applicants are not affected. [read post]
