Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Technogenia v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 12:33 am
This has been solidified ever since the House of Lords pronounced its decision in Caparo Industries Plc v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 5:28 pm
Hurd v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:13 am
Patel, R (on the application of) v Lord Chancellor [2010] EWHC 2220 (Admin) (27 August 2010) – Read judgment The wife of the purported ringleader of the ’7/7? [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
Today the Tenth Circuit told the state of Utah that it could no longer erect crosses by the side of the highway memorializing state troopers who have died. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:20 am
State, 73 Alabama, 366; State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 3:15 am
The subject of this little rant was the dispute in Hudson Bay Apparel Brands LLC v Umbro International Ltd. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:15 am
Listening to the well-rehearsed arguments will be Lords Walker and Collins and Lady Hale.Anti Copying in Design -- better known as ACID -- has just released its latest newsletter. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 11:17 am
CRC Credit Fund Limited v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:04 am
Further, their Lord Justices noted the considerable case law which states that claims under a policy of indemnity are claims for unliquidated damages. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:04 pm
Ultimately, as Lord Hoffmann states in R-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms [2000] 2 AC 115, 131, Parliament can, if it chooses, legislate contrary to fundamental principles of human rights (provided it squarely confronts what it is doing). [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
It should also state that the employer will not tolerate any misuse of its social media networks that would breach the confidentiality of it or its clients or cause embarrassment to them. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
Morley & Ors v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:24 am
As Lord Woolf said in the case of Jones v Warwick, the principle that evidence can be obtained in whichever way one likes, whether illegally or not, must be at least concerning to society as a whole: While this approach will help to achieve justice in a particular case, it will do nothing to promote the observance of the law by those engaged or about to be engaged in legal proceedings. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:04 am
In the case of obviousness in view of the state of the art, a key question is generally “what problem was the patentee trying to solve? [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
The very unsatisfactory decision of the House of Lords in Attorney General v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 3:28 am
AN v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 869 (28 July 2010) – Read judgment The Court of Appeal has held that control orders of three men suspected of terrorism revoked by the Government should in fact be quashed altogether. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:31 am
The unanimous judgment of the court was given by Lord Kerr. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 10:49 pm
” So observed Lord Clarke recently, in delivering the unanimous judgment of the United Kingdom Supreme Court in RTS Flexible Systems [“RTS”] v. [read post]
