Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 3381 - 3400 of 15,539
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2018, 11:42 pm by Mark Summerfield
  I would have to say, however, that there is little in the first instance decision in Encompass v InfoTrack to indicate just how far the bar has been raised. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 7:49 am by Asude Sena Moya
While explaining this case, Rose Hughes pointed out the relatively low sufficiency bar in Europe for second medical use inventions.Katfriend Peter Arrowsmith (GJE) discussed the recent Court of Appeal decision in Comptroller - General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks v Emotional Perception AI Limited [2024] EWCA Civ 825. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Today’s Mississippi Supreme Court decision in Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:35 pm by Colin O'Keefe
That continues this week as they've been all over Christopher v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:43 pm by jly
Cahn and Carbone’s important new book, Red Families v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:00 am by Katherine Gundersen
The process of barnardisation (by which low numbers were randomly increased or decreased by 1 or left as they were) was not capable of doing this, since Lord Hope had expressly recognised that the CSA would still hold data identifying the children concerned. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
This post concerns the Opinion of the Advocate General in Case C-362/14: Schrems v. [read post]