Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 4,608
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2010, 2:39 am
These include information on the applicant's race, religion, national origin, age, pregnancy status, marital status, disability, sexual orientation (some state and local jurisdictions), gender expression or identity (some state and local jurisdictions) and genetic information. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:07 pm
LimeWire, RIAA both search for ‘Pirate Edition’ creator (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) Microsoft – Microsoft embraces first wave of Kinect innovation (EFF) (Michael Geist) MP3Tunes – MP3Tunes safe harbor challenge a legal test for cloud storage (Ars Technica) RapGodFathers – Music linking site raided by Dept of Homeland Security/ Immigration & Customs Enforcement (TorrentFreak) Syfert, Graham – Hurt Locker makers sue lawyer who helped… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
Title: Smith v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 6:09 am
Omega, on the other hand, has support of the Obama administration, the ABA, and of course the music and film industries. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
Universal Music Corp., Case No. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 12:30 pm
United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 10-cv-4071, U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:34 pm
Nahum (IP Law Blog) District Court S D New York: Amazon isn’t liable for rogue affiliate’s keyword ad buys: Sellify v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:39 pm
Discusses the Federal Arbitrazh Court of Moscow Region decisions in: Content i pravo LLC v Masterhost dismissing a song owner’s claim for compensation against an HSP, which hosted a website on which several of its songs had been placed; and First Music Publishing House LLC v Rambler Internet holding that an HSP was liable for administrating a website on which music was posted and not removing it, even after being alerted as to copyright infringement. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:18 pm
As the Full Court said in Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2003] FCAFC 193; (2003) 131 FCR 529, [310]: “If a company ‘takes the odds’, it must expect serious consequences if it miscalculates”. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:24 pm
See Hard Rock Cafe International (USA), Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:01 am
Hands-free control of your smart phone not only makes good sense, it is the law in more and more states. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:24 pm
United States (involving salary adjustments for federal judges), Allen v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:16 am
The state court decision (People v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Becton Dickinson; TiVo v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 9:43 am
[who said] he installed Limewire with Durham's daughter for her to download music. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Nahum (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court Nevada: Online forum operator gets easy 47 USC 230 Win: Two Plus Two v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:25 pm
Lopez (1995), United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 1:24 pm
And I’m not very interested in a discussion of Fox v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 12:01 pm
Also being argued on Tuesday, but not reminding me of any Broadway musicals, is United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:54 pm
The pre-CPR working rule to be found in the judgment of Nourse LJ in Re Elgindata Ltd (No 2) 1 WLR 1207 was modified by the observations of Woolf Lord in AEI Rediffusion Music Ltd v Phonographic Performance Ltd to the effect that it is no longer necessary for a party to have acted unreasonably or improperly to be deprived of his costs on a particular issue on which he has failed. [read post]
