Search for: "Mark May" Results 3381 - 3400 of 64,936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm by Mark Stanley
12/20/2011 Author:  Mark Stanley Digital Copyright Filtering/Watermarking/DRM It was announced today that the House Judiciary Committee markup of… [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:46 am
Welcome to the IP Think Tank podcast for Monday 18th May 2009. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:36 pm by James Yang
  They may ignore the patent-pending notice, but that would not be recommended. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:22 am
Briefs and other papers for each case may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.February 13, 2024 - 1 PM: Iron Balls International Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:01 am by Jeremy
 A Turkish company with the striking name POLIN SU PARKLARI VE HAVUZ SİSTEMLERI ANONIM SIRKETI (in English, "Pole Water Park and Pool Systems Joint Stock Company"), was the original proprietor of the trade mark "Polin stylized in color", International Registration no. 1061615, registered on 14 May 2010 in many countries for goods in Class 28. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:26 am by Jonathan H. Adler
At last count, Democratic State Senator Mark R. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:31 am
" The Board noted that, under the Trademark Act, "a trademark application may only seek to register a single mark. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:19 am by Nedim Malovic
Second, the judgment demonstrates the potential repute and strengths that trade marks may possess in the UK, as well as signalling the strength of unregistered rights when it comes to passing off and copyright. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 5:47 am
If a term has a relevant, well-understood meaning, it may be considered a weak formative.The Board noted that the involved marks do not share the word JACQUES, and it concluded that applicant's evidence "at most merely corroborates Applicant’s dictionary evidence indicating that American consumers would understand JACQUES to be a first name when it appears in Applicant’s mark. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 3:32 am
- ed.].As to the goods and services, the Board found that the goods in the prior registrations "appear" to be closely related to the services in the involved application, since they may be used to download, display, read and store the electronic publication provided by Apple's services. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 8:05 am
Accordingly, a low degree of similarity between goods or services may be offset by a high degree of similarity between the marks, and vice versa. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:09 am by Kashmir Hill
And within the private sector, attractiveness may determine which practice group you are in. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 10:02 am by Scott Hervey
The Federal Circuit’s opinion may open the door for the registration of marks that may be potentially disparaging and new applications for marks previously refused registration based on Section 2(a). [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:00 am
The next question was whether applicant's goods qualify for an exemption under the CSA, and if so, whether applicant may obtain registrations for its marks. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:19 am by R. David Donoghue
So, this term may effectively be a complete release of all possible false marking claims. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 11:39 am by Brian Scott
It is also useful to use the classification part of the text if you are image searching, as this will help filter out any classes which may not be relevant to your registration.From this search, you should be able to get a rough idea of whether your trade mark is already registered or whether or not you need to seek legal advice or support in searching or registering your mark. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 6:58 am
This kind of arrangement may work better when both owners have some interest in continung to use the mark. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:05 am by @travelblawg
Not only may your identity be revealed, you may be exposed to court awarded damages against you personally. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:42 am by John L. Welch
And even if the record shows that the registered mark is weak, even weak marks are entitled to protection against registration by a subsequent user of a similar mark for related goods.The Board agreed with the PTO that watches and jewelry may emanate from the same source. [read post]