Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2013, 5:26 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada’s much-anticipated decision in Canada (Attorney General) v Bedford (Bedford) represents an important victory for sex workers’ rights. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 10:08 am
On December 19, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order in the case of Doe I v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:50 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 2:35 am
The Secretary of State appealed the decision to the Upper Tribunal and was allowed the appeal in respect of the definition of adoption in para 352D. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:27 am
See, Astral Media Radio Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm
Specifically, there was no specific reference to the Guidance, para 17.40 specifically. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm
Specifically, there was no specific reference to the Guidance, para 17.40 specifically. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Galerie d'Art du Petit Champlain inc., 2002 SCC 34, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 336, at para. 5; Compo Co. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 10:53 am
Canada (Attorney General), 2008 BCCA 27 at paras. 30 and 31: [30] British Columbia v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 10:33 am
In Larson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:27 am
And who on planet Earth would ever think up a question like this, if it wasn't for the persistent attempts of the CJEU and Europe's finest IP lawyers to categorise confusion as a state of law rather than as a state of fact?]. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 10:50 am
Summary of Order December 4, 2013Case Name: BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, WYOMING STATE BAR v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Why (ditto) can’t para-legals do family work? [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
(Id. at ¶ 50.) [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 2:36 am
Con motivo de la celebración del sexagésimo quinto aniversario de la Declaración Internacional de los Derechos Humanos, el Colegio de Abogados de Puerto Rico (CAPR), la Comisión para los Derechos de los Inmigrantes, la Comisión de Derechos Humanos y la Comisión contra el Discrimen por Razón de Preferencia Sexual le invitan a participar del foro: United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
”And finally, did:the combined effect of [R (Limbuela) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396 (HL(E)) ] and Clue establish that there is a free standing duty to accommodate and provide cash to a person like the Claimant who is within the boundaries of a local authority and whose Convention rights are threatened? [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
”And finally, did:the combined effect of [R (Limbuela) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396 (HL(E)) ] and Clue establish that there is a free standing duty to accommodate and provide cash to a person like the Claimant who is within the boundaries of a local authority and whose Convention rights are threatened? [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:14 pm
¶;¶ 11, 17. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:00 pm
Three updates in Aamer v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
[This is substantially changed - previously stated (at "sixthly") there are no grounds for presuming that duplication of proceedings would be, without further reason, grounds for a stay.] [read post]
