Search for: "Pass v. State" Results 3381 - 3400 of 28,411
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2022, 8:23 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The discussion in Parts II and IV of the Court's opinion is unnecessary to the result, and much of it addresses disputed state-law questions as well as arguments not pressed or passed upon in this case.* And the footnote: *The same is true of Part I. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: This short essay argues that the congruence and proportionality test of City of Boerne v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
To help assure that they do, students submit one-page summaries of each half of the book (graded pass-fail). [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The fact that we have single-member districts is the result of an 1842 law passed by Congress, that made good sense at the time, coupled with its reaffirmation by a later law passed in the 1960s. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 6:46 pm by Francis Pileggi
” The Authentix CEO – who was also a member of the board is also conflicted for purposes of this motion because he “allegedly stated during Sale negotiations that he “worked for Carlyle” and “had been told to sell the company,” the court said. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 11:37 am by Jennifer Davis
Korematsu v. the United States :  World War II Japanese-American internment camps. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
The claim relates to two instances in which Cadwalladr accused the businessman of lying about his relationship with the Russian state. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 11:00 pm by Hayleigh Bosher
Even though blockchain is a public ledger it is not always possible to identify the perpetrator, such as in the Lavinia Deborah Osbourne v Ozone Networks case mentioned above. [read post]
A US federal judge Friday ordered the state of Louisiana to pay a USD 3.8 million settlement for legal fees to the Center for Reproductive Rights and law firms who challenged the state’s abortion restrictions on doctors in June Medical Services LLC et al v. [read post]