Search for: "People v Long"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 19,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2010, 12:21 am
In the new case, United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:43 pm
Goff v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:52 pm
Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983). [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 12:18 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled (in Nordyke v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Neil’s question is simple: does Twitter have a long-term future? [read post]
16 Jun 2006, 3:49 am
Given the weight of post-Spiliada authority any change will however require legislation: which will be , one suspects, a long time coming. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 6:00 pm
As the anniversary of US v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
” Allen v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 9:31 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:48 am
In part due to his current health problems, in part to his change of careers, and in part because the district court judge simply thought that was the case, saying: "I've been doing this long enough and I can tell, I think, when people are genuine . . . . [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 8:48 am
(Law on Legislation, Art. 8(v); that's one reason why re-education through labor, with its flimsy statutory basis, has been under attack.) [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 3:40 pm
The 1st Claimant, Ms Blake, was a long-standing user of the service and she complained that she would be unable to access the proposed new site given her mobility problems and her inability to afford the bus fare. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 12:17 pm
And the Supreme Court in Van de Kamp v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 3:36 am
There is a natural inclination to analogize “body integrity identity dysphoria” with “body dysmorphia,” the latter being a recognized condition in the DSM-V and a manifestation being reflected in transgender people. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 1:19 pm
When I — and I’m not alone — try to explain this to people, they are either incapable, or unwilling, to sit still long enough to process the argument. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 12:34 pm
Marion County Election Board (07-21) and Indiana Democratic Party v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:35 am
One of the cases argued with Brown, Bolling v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
And that the opinion will seem pretty clearly right as long as you respond to defendant's best argument in a part of the opinion that most people will skim over rather than respond to it directly.This is also, I might add, how bad law gets created. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 11:48 am
Even people like Justice Brennan, who would prefer the second requirement to occasionally obviate the need for the first, have signed onto this test.But Judge Bybee concurs exclusively to argue that the second requirement shouldn't matter -- that as long as the defendant has minimum contacts, it shouldn't matter whether the exercise of personal jurisdiction is fair. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:31 am
She recounted how John Tuma could not tell the jury how long it would take the facility to treat even just one truck load of waste water. [read post]
