Search for: "Peter v. Peter" Results 3381 - 3400 of 8,629
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
Peter Swann’s book “Common Innovation: How We Create the Wealth of Nations”, in which the author seeks to further those arguments, by delving into common innovation, which he defines as “innovation carried out by ‘the common man and woman’ for their own benefit”.EPO takes an ‘about turn’ on the patentability of products obtained by essentially biological processesAt the end of June the EPO published a notice stating from 1 July 2017… [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 9:43 am
Peter Meier-Beck from Germany and Rian Kalden from the Netherlands, should make sure to attend the Institute of Brand and Innovation Law (IBIL)'s debate "Equivalents: K = Na. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 9:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Peters: why allow © on court reports? [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 8:36 am by Kenan Farrell
While researching, I spotted a few other interesting uses of STOP THE DROP in the USPTO database: Loopy Cases LLC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In an unprecedented move, the Chief Justice recently varied the decision by Justice Wagner over intervener groups in the appeal of Trinity Western University, et al. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 2:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Andrew Hamilton was not related to Alexander Hamilton, but likely the last important public act of Alexander Hamilton’s life was making an argument in another landmark free press case (People v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 7:35 am by Bryan P. Sears
Maloney, a partner at Greenbelt-based Joseph Greenwald & Laake, is a longtime friend of Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 3:57 am by Scott Bomboy
Years later, Founding Father Gouverneur Morris said the verdict in Crown v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:17 am by Erik J. Heels
Tam’ case below.http://thettablog.blogspot.com/2017/06/uspto-issues-new-examination-guideline.html * Matal v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Peter Sherwood is the latest in a series of trial and appellate court rulings, spread over seven years and three separate lawsuits, rejecting claims by the LLCs’ non-managing one-third owner against the managing two-thirds owner allegedly for failing to distribute millions in management and acquisition fees. [read post]