Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 3381 - 3400 of 13,619
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2019, 9:00 am by Andrew Hamm
On Wednesday, the justices hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:06 pm by opseo
You may need to provide proof of filing previous tax returns before filing your petition. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:15 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2018-2019update.html Petitions for certiorari were filed recently in these cases: Havasupai Tribe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:20 pm by Unknown
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2018-2019update.html Petitions for certiorari were filed recently in these cases: Havasupai Tribe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:20 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2018-2019update.html Petitions for certiorari were filed recently in these cases: Havasupai Tribe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 1:15 pm by Sherry Knowles
Athena Diagnostics filed a petition for en banc rehearing of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Athena Diagnostics v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 1:15 pm by Sherry Knowles
Athena Diagnostics filed a petition for en banc rehearing of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Athena Diagnostics v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm by Rachael Hanna
With respect to the applicability of the Constitution, Dixon cited Justice Anthony Kennedy’s concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 11:05 am by Jessica Zhang
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied a petition for en banc rehearing in Hamama v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 12:33 pm by Andrew Patterson
 The government made such a petition after this same court enjoined the travel ban in Trump v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The plaintiff [Petitioner] in this action was initially employed by the City of Lockport [Lockport] in a position in a collective bargaining unit represented by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees [AFSCME]. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The plaintiff [Petitioner] in this action was initially employed by the City of Lockport [Lockport] in a position in a collective bargaining unit represented by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees [AFSCME]. [read post]