Search for: "Rolling v. State"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 4,418
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2011, 11:30 pm
“Accountability” is not synonymous with “Heads must roll”. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:42 pm
People v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:29 am
For the Court's full decision in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 5:39 am
U.S. v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:22 am
” Brief for United States, Timken Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 3:21 am
The Spectator reports that the Secretary of State for education Michael Gove intends to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:20 pm
Hill v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:15 am
To say the least, the trial was followed by a media hue and cry demanding that heads roll. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:49 am
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:02 am
Said the Master of the Rolls, with whom Etherton and :Patten LJJ agreed): "37. [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:21 am
POM’s Answer generally denies the allegations and states that the FTC lacks the authority to impose the relief it seeks (which is painstakingly extensive — taking up four full pages!). [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:35 am
For a second day, media outlets are flush with analysis of Monday’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:19 am
They were: Ntuli v Donald [2010] EWCA Civ 1276 (set aside on appeal) and DFT v TFD [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB) (granted for seven days for anti-tipping-off reasons). [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
(Spicy IP) DIPP releases discussion paper on utility models (Spicy IP) Israel The USTR’s rite of Spring – Special 301 Report (America-Israel Patent Law) Mexico Forged alcohol beverages receive more than a hangover (IP tango) Netherlands Human rights trump design rights – District Court of The Hague lifts ex parte injunction against artist in Nadja Plesner v Louis Vuitton (IPKat) (Class 99) District Court of The Hague invalidates Fritsch’s patent relating to an… [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:19 am
James Madison must be rolling in his grave. [read post]
22 May 2011, 6:13 pm
Don’t roll the dice with the court. [read post]
21 May 2011, 5:53 am
One was set aside on appeal (Ntuli v Donald [2010] EWCA Civ 1276). [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:47 am
It also asserted that 16 CFR part 1512 is out of date in many respects, stated its understanding that the CPSC may commence rulemaking to revise part 1512 in the near future, and urged the Commission to begin such rulemaking. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:15 am
Take Kentucky v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:38 am
So, for this case anyhow, the CYAC v. [read post]
