Search for: "S G
v.
J G"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 3,821
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2009, 8:27 am
Based upon William Vickrey’s idea that traffic jams occur when drivers are not charged for the full costs they impose upon others the theory dates back to 1952. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 10:31 am
g. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:51 pm
We placed Heath's case in abeyance pending the Supreme Court's decision in Gall v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 8:43 pm
Prentky, Sexual Predator Laws: A Two-Decade Retrospective Mary Graw Leary, Kennedy v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:51 pm
Prentky, Sexual Predator Laws: A Two-Decade Retrospective Mary Graw Leary, Kennedy v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 8:49 am
Selon nous, s’il y a un progrès en gestation depuis la fin du XXe siècle qui pourrait marquer le passage de notre génération sur terre, c’est bien celui du partage de la connaissance. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:24 am
R v G; R v J [2009] UKHL 13; [2009] WLR (D) 80 “To rely on the defence in s 58(3) of the Terrorism Act 2000 a defendant had to show an objectively ‘reasonable excuse’ for his action or possession and a ruling that neither a desire to ‘wind up’ prison officers nor mental illness could [...] [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:02 am
Delores G. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:30 am
R v G (Respondent) (on appeal from the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) R v J (Respondent) (on appeal from the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) R (on the application of Ahmad) (Respondent) v Mayor and Burgesses of London Borough of Newham (Appellants) Source: www.parliament.uk [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 9:25 pm
Harris, 2004 BCCA 146] that influence an award of non-pecuniary damages includes: (a) age of the plaintiff; (b) nature of the injury; (c) severity and duration of pain; (d) disability; (e) emotional suffering; and (f) loss or impairment of life; I would add the following factors, although they may arguably be subsumed in the above list: (g) impairment of family, marital and social… [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:12 am
Waldrip, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Plaintiff): Bill G. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:18 am
The central purpose of this investigation is to see, in Justice Story's words, whether the new workmerely "supersede[s] the objects" of the original creation, Folsom v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:18 am
The central purpose of this investigation is to see, in Justice Story's words, whether the new workmerely "supersede[s] the objects" of the original creation, Folsom v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:15 pm
Today's U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:35 am
G-01-058 (S.D. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:27 am
L.Rev. 99, 128-32 (1989); Christopher G. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Excess Copyright) Copyright and Canada’s trade deficit – Cui bono? [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 12:18 am
Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (David G. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:41 am
Hulkover, and Bruce Bishop-#1, Thomas G. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 6:08 pm
Following up on the Ontario Superior Court's recent decision on parental alienation in A.G.L. v. [read post]
