Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 3381 - 3400 of 21,151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2020, 7:21 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This is a necessary risk that comes with the commercial enterprise that seeks to profit over the sale of alcohol. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 6:39 am by Anna Salvatore
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the latest news in Trump v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:48 pm by Nina Skinner
  Rule 144A provides a safe harbor exemption from registration for the sale or resale of restricted securities to qualified institutional buyers, commonly referred to as “QIBs”. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:48 pm by Liskow & Lewis
  Rule 144A provides a safe harbor exemption from registration for the sale or resale of restricted securities to qualified institutional buyers, commonly referred to as “QIBs”. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:04 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  [3] In Delaware (and other states that follow its jurisprudence), there are a few context-specific exceptions, such as in connection with the “sale of control” of a company wh [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 6:17 pm by Robert Chesney
This strongly suggests that the secretary of commerce’s forthcoming directive explaining the scope of the IEEPA sanction will include a carve-out allowing TikTok and its bankers, lawyers and other professionals to continue to work to close the deal on the sale of the company to any of several possible US companies interested in purchasing it. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am by Judith Robinson
In light of its findings on these four elements of the test, the court stated it was not necessary to look at the fifth element of whether Costco would be reasonably compensated for its expenses and legal costs. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am by Judith Robinson
In light of its findings on these four elements of the test, the court stated it was not necessary to look at the fifth element of whether Costco would be reasonably compensated for its expenses and legal costs. [read post]
Matson’s complaint alleged that the terms of sale were unconscionable, and they relied on a mistake of fact when purchasing the deed of trust. [read post]