Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 4,639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am
P'ship v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am
P'ship v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:43 am
Here is the abstract: In United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 pm
Waxman representing i4i, and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stuart arguing as amicus curiae on behalf of the United States in support of i4i. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:28 am
The Court recently struck a federal law that criminalized, among other things, the sale of dogfighting videos (United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
H (2002) 1 FLR 1008 (United Kingdom -- Family Division -- 2002); see also Robertson v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:11 am
Justice Scalia, dissenting in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:05 am
Waxman, a former United States solicitor general, was caught in the cross-fire. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:51 am
The New York Times’ article also quoted Judge Richard Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit writing in Randall v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:01 pm
”) Background Facts Staub, a member of the United States Army Reserve, worked at Proctor Hospital as an angiography technician. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 7:38 am
In certain localities in the United States, parental objections to vaccination have resulted in a high proportion of children forgoing immunization. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:52 am
In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage notes that, in his concurring opinion in Connick, Justice Scalia cited the Court’s 1988 decision in Arizona v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:57 am
JUSTICE SCALIA: — which said that, you know, it may well be that every industry in the United States is guilty of sex discrimination MR. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:54 am
United States, No. 10-5443. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:25 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument last week in a case further exploring the contours of the Miranda warning, J.D.B. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 9:01 am
Justice Scalia wrote “While the jurisprudence of this court has sometimes sanctioned a ‘living Constitution, it has never approved a living United States Code. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:31 am
Palmore, Assistant to the Solicitor General, who argued on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of the Borough. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:33 am
That’s because in 1995 the Court construed that 1925 statute to apply to the vast majority of contracts made in the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:58 pm
In People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 2:01 pm
United States, 28 F. 2d 265, 267 (CA3 1928) (finding words “file a claim for refund” to require a written request in context of tax code). [read post]
