Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 5,473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
WrightDocket: 11-748Issue(s): (1) Whether search warrants for a business that shares multi-occupancy buildings with others violate the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment where the warrants fail to identify the offices, floors or areas to be searched or the specific items to be seized, despite the officer’s knowledge of the business’s location within the buildings and the limited portion of the business under investigation; and (2)… [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 8:34 am
This was considered to be an unwarranted invasion of a person's strong Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures in his/her home or on his/her residential property. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 10:00 am
One idea: some rights are personal (such as the privilege against self-incrimination) and other rights are more structural (like the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures). [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:57 am
§ 1801–1812, and evidence obtained from physical searches. 50 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
"There are more points of facts that show the search warrant should never have been issued had all the evidence been reviewed properly beforehand, rendering the search and seizure illegal. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 3:47 am
The fact some small things were seized under a documents warrant did not rise to the level of an “abrasive” search (United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 5:01 am
” A first warrantless search was found valid, but the second was not. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:17 pm
The case of US v Jones is ostensibly one which turns on the Fourth Amendment (the right against search and seizure). [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 11:26 am
As this site notes, (i) the 4th Amendment creates a right to be free from “unreasonable” searches and seizures and (ii) creates a default preference for warrants, i.e., means that searches and seizures should, whenever possible, be conducted pursuant to a search (and seizure) warrant. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:49 am
All of these ex parte shutdown cases (and there are probably many more out there) warrant a *close* look. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:40 am
There is no search or seizure when that is obtained, because there isn't a reasonable expectation of privacy? [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 11:23 am
Constitution, which protects citizens against unreasonable search and seizure and outlines the necessity of warrants in searches. . . . [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:59 am
As I’ve explained in earlier posts, and as Wikipedia notes, consent is an exception to the 4th Amendment’s default requirement that police obtain a search (and seizure) warrant before searching someone’s property and seizing evidence they find there. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 9:03 pm
LEXIS 7 (January 13, 2012): In this appeal we consider the long-standing emergency aid exception to the general requirement that a search warrant be obtained prior to police entry into a residence. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 12:33 pm
Warrant cases in Jacksonville can range from bad arrest warrants, improper search warrants, searching the wrong address with a search warrant, and more. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 9:21 am
Did the officers obtain search warrants before entering the homes and if so, were the search warrants obtained legally, following the criteria needed to obtain a search warrant. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
He also cited CAAF itself for the principle that consent is a waiver of the right to demand that the government agents obtain a warrant to justify the search. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:23 am
Rodriguez’s objection that removal of the cover from the phone is akin to a closed container search requiring a warrant, see United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
” No, actually, that’s the Google search algorithm that disappears websites. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:12 am
Appellant argued that the search and seizure of her cell phone was improper because the warrant did not particularly describe it as one of the items to be seized. [read post]
