Search for: "State v Locke" Results 3381 - 3400 of 3,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am by TJ McIntyre
  Requiring passwords is a significant power, given that without the key the lock remains unopened. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
The state of California’s lawyer, Washington attorney Carter G. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:56 pm by Rick
When they locked up the social democrats, I remained silent; I was not a social democrat. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:59 am by Terry Hart
The state of things in totalitarian countries may induce us to revise this opinion. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:03 am by admin
    And it’s named after an inspiring figure:   Raymond V. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Indeed, just last term, in Gundy v. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:18 pm
The British Columbia proceeding, Boundary Museum Society v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm by Giles Peaker
(Finally) AA v London Borough of Southwark [2014] EWHC 500 (QB) This High Court judgment is remarkable in many ways, most of them worrying. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:06 pm by Cory Doctorow
Software patenting went into high gear around 1994 and consistently gained speed until 2014, when Alice v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:26 am
This approach would lock in shifts similar to those imposed in the last two years and since made illegal by the passage of Proposition 22. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 3:46 am by SHG
The Supreme Court ruled in the landmark 1975 case O’Connor v. [read post]