Search for: "State v. Bodi"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 14,868
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2020, 4:21 pm
The original two judgments can be found here : A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWFC 38 (11 May 2020) (Main judgment) A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWHC 1162 (Fam) (11 May 2020 (Original decision to anonymise) The latest judgment can be found here : PA Media Group v London Borough of Haringey & Ors [2020] EWHC 1282 (Fam) (20 May 2020) You can read Louise Tickle’s tweet thread here : Our team member @louisetickle is a… [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:18 pm
The cse of ATV ZRT v Hungary concerned sections 12(3) and (4) of the Act which prohibits media service providers from adding ‘any opinion or evaluative explanation to the political news’ without ‘distinguishing it from the news [itself]’. [read post]
18 May 2020, 7:05 pm
State v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:11 pm
The article reported on what was stated in the LoR. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Francello v Mendoza, 165 AD3d 1555 and Matter of State of New York v New York State Pub. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Francello v Mendoza, 165 AD3d 1555 and Matter of State of New York v New York State Pub. [read post]
18 May 2020, 3:15 am
Hearthside Baking, Scafom International BV v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 8:14 am
One of the most interesting elements of the pandemic has been the way in which it is crystallizing the governance cultures within which key outside stakeholders, civil society mostly, engage with the responsibilities and ambitions of regulatory bodies--states, international organizations, business, and religion. [read post]
15 May 2020, 6:20 am
There are two judgments : A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWFC 38 (11 May 2020) and A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWHC 1162 (Fam) (11 May 2020). [read post]
14 May 2020, 12:09 pm
See U.S. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:56 am
My essay addresses some of the legal issues: whether bans are "generally applicable" under Employment Division v Smith, how courts might weigh the burden on religion against the state's interest in curbing the epidemic, whether less-restrictive means are available, etc. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm
Yoo and LaCroix commented on how that executive order squares with a Supreme Court decision that shaped modern understanding of presidential power— Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
Trump v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:22 am
Written by Yannick Morath Yannick Morath, doctoral candidate at the University of Freiburg, has kindly provided us with his thoughts on the CJEU’s judgement in the case of LG and Others v Rina SpA, Ente Registro Italiano Navale (C-641/18 – ECLI:EU:C:2020:349) (See also the earlier post by Matthias Weller concerning the CJEU’s judgement). [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:47 pm
Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:24 pm
McGirt v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:20 am
State v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:06 am
Farmer, John, and V. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:41 pm
Rassbach pointed to some of the roles described in the court’s 2012 ruling in Hosanna-Tabor Lutheran Church v. [read post]
