Search for: "State v. Character" Results 3381 - 3400 of 7,506
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2015, 12:04 pm
Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
 Harking back to a time before fax, email, and before any of our intellectual property laws in the UK existed in their present form, when neither OHIM nor the EPO existed and WIPO was but a babe, he reminisced thus:WHERE ARE WE v WHERE I THOUGHT WE’D BE My first taste of IP came in 1973, when I found myself researching for a PhD on ownership of IP rights. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
Examining Diageo Brands BV v Simiramida-04 EOOD [2015] C-681/13) James drew attention to the CJEU’s strict approach to countries refusing to enforce judgments from another Member State on the grounds of public policy. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Lisa Girdwood, Brodies LLP
Ultimately, it is the stability of residence which is important and not whether it has a permanent character. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 6:15 am
The Board granted the petition of adidas AG for cancellation of two registrations owned by the Christian Faith Fellowship Church for the mark ADD A ZERO, in standard character and design form, for "clothing, namely shirts and caps," finding that the Church had not used the marks in commerce prior to the filing date of the underlying applications. adidas AG v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 1:57 pm by Stephen Griffin
”  Dorf’s nonoriginalist alternative ground, very popular among living constitutionalists, is the contemporary acceptance of the Constitution by the people of the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
Il commence ainsi un duel judiciaire, dans lequel ce qui compte ne sont pas les faits, mais leur interprétation et lacapacité des deux avocats.Ce sera la justicequi gagnera ou bine l'habileté dans la manipulation des évènements? [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
” I’m pleased to say that yesterday a Montana trial court held that the Montana criminal defamation statute is facially unconstitutional, and thus dismissed the group libel charge (State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:32 am by Joy Waltemath
The lower court further concluded that under the Tenth Circuit’s decision in Jones v. [read post]