Search for: "State v. Gaines"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 9,705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm
[For a similar statement, see McCabe v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:31 pm
It was also addressed by the doctrine of Swift v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:13 am
In context this article is essentially stating that the married woman cannot be forced to enter gainful employment and as the primary carer of the children of the marriage has a special role in the raising of these children which must be protected by the State, whereas (as per the Supreme Court in G v An Bord Uchtala) the unmarried mother and her child do not constitute a family within the meaning of Art 41 and as such do not enjoy the protection of the Article. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:16 pm
See State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:16 pm
See State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:22 am
In Hodari D. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:36 am
Nevertheless, she also stated that “race-conscious admissions policies must be limited in time. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:47 am
In Pulsifer v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 9:06 am
A recent example is Szymanski v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 3:06 pm
State, Case No. 2D11-5349 (Fla. 2nd DCA August 3, 2012). [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 4:49 pm
The board, which licenses and disciplines CPAs in the state, sought permissive intervention in the Enron litigation as a way of gaining access to materials protected by the district court order. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 4:49 pm
The board, which licenses and disciplines CPAs in the state, sought permissive intervention in the Enron litigation as a way of gaining access to materials protected by the district court order. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Along these lines, it is easy to read Chiafalo v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:01 am
You may recall, while we're on the subject of stripes, that I previously have written: "Adidas appears to have gained a one stripe buffer on either side of its powerful three stripe iconic symbol" in Counting By Numbers, or Stripes? [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 1:35 am
In the case of Warner v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:56 am
Chavan v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 10:20 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
Of particular note, he stated Torrential Downpour's direct connection capabilities were no different from other commercially available versions of BitTorrent and it (Torrential Downpour) had no rate of error.U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:50 am
District Court for the District of Columbia referenced my most-noted formulation of this principle in a foreign-cubed piracy case, United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 8:23 am
A recent Federal Court of Appeal case, Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
