Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 25,981
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2022, 2:46 pm
That's today's order from Judges Andrew Hurwitz, Daniel Bress, and Patrick Bumatay: The district court's judgment is vacated, and this case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the United States Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 3:02 am
In Kolnacki v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 6:29 am
[State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:26 pm
Supreme Court decision in Bilski v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:10 pm
"Remedies" that go unused when serious, documented prosecutorial misconduct comes to light are little better, and perhaps worse, than no remedies at all. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 2:17 pm
In the coming weeks, the court is poised to issue a major ruling in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 6:17 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:40 pm
(quoting United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:11 am
The Court noted that the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit considered the question in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Tribal rights, water rights, states’ rights and the Colorado River: What’s at stake in the SCOTUS case, Arizona v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
If you enjoy reading interesting opinions from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (as do I), State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:26 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 6:49 am
Detail of a ambulance light. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 3:51 am
Holland's subsequent amendments resulted with the following claims: breach of contract (count II); breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing (count III); false light (invasion of privacy) (count IV); unfair and deceptive trade practices (count V); violation of the Lanham Act (count VI); and unjust enrichment/restitution (count VII). [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 10:01 pm
") THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:23 am
At CATO@Liberty, Julian Sanchez responds to Orin Kerr’s preview of United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: The case of R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58Victim Fine Surcharges Today, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in four cases, heard together as R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:27 am
State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
This is why, for example, testing a defendant’s white powder to see whether it is cocaine invades no reasonable expectation of privacy, under United States v. [read post]
